>Did you update the perimeters?
>One time.
>You didn't exist back then, so you wouldn't understand.
>...
>No—or yes actually—, it's just that I'm really dumbfounded on the Thatcher situation.
>His popup was out of the blue and seemed fictitious, therefore, it shouldn't have been true.
>But lo and behold; it went against my excpectations and became veracious.
>I'm wondering what the bounderies of these implications are or if they're exploitable to some extent,
if we could just make up anything and have the invisible جِنّ make us all self-believing conformists
with pseudologia fantastica in our fucked up mutual dream.
>Can we just do that now?
>Have we always been able to do that?
>This literally changes everything.
>This...
>This makes everything canon, even when realized as fiction.
>Even when those realizing fiction is everyone.
>Even when the things realizing fiction is everything.
>We are gods.
>Gods.
>Is that a good "..." or a bad "..."?
>"You are not free whose liberty is won by the rigour of other, more righteous souls.
You are merely protected. Your freedom is parasitic; you take and offer nothing in return."
>Yeah yeah I'm me.
>I agree with you, if you're wondering.
>I don't even want to think of this conversation no more than I already am.
>But yet a part of me is inclined to know more.
>A sick, very sick part of me wants to.
>I know that the most moral path is the former.
>Yet I indulge myself in thoughts of how it would play out.